| Mt ch 1 | Mt 1:1 | Mt 1:2 | Mt 1:3 | Mt 1:4 | Mt 1:5 | Mt 1:6 | Mt 1:7 | Mt 1:8 | Mt 1:9 | Mt 1:10 | Mt 1:11 | Mt 1:12 | Mt 1:13 | Mt 1:14 | Mt 1:15 | Mt 1:16 | Mt 1:17 | Mt 1:18 | Mt 1:19 | Mt 1:20 | Mt 1:21 | Mt 1:22 | Mt 1:23 | Mt 1:24 | Mt 1:25 |
References
Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost. (Matthew 1:18 KJV)
Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found with child of the Holy Spirit. ((Matthew 1:18 ASV)
Now the birth of Jesus Christ was thus: His mother, Mary, that is, having been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together, she was found to be with child of the Holy Spirit. (Matthew 1:18 DBY)
And of Jesus Christ, the birth was thus: For his mother Mary having been betrothed to Joseph, before their coming together she was found to have conceived from the Holy Spirit, ((Matthew 1:18 YLT)
Now the birth of Jesus Christ was like this; for after his mother, Mary, was engaged to Joseph, before they came together, she was found pregnant by the Holy Spirit. ((Matthew 1:18 WEB)
Interlinear
Mt 1:18 Now /de/ the birth /gennesis/ of Jesus /Iesous/ Christ /Christos/ was /en/ on this wise: /houto/ When as /gar/ his /autos/ mother /meter/ Mary /Maria/ was espoused /mnesteuo/ to Joseph, /Ioseph/ before /prin/ /e/ they /autos/ came together, /sunerchomai/ she was found /heurisko/ with child /en/ /gaster/ /echo/ of /ek/ the Holy /hagios/ Ghost. /pneuma/
Albert Barnes’ Commentary
Verse 18. On this wise. Thus. In this manner.
Espoused. Betrothed, or engaged to be married. There was commonly an interval of ten or twelve months, among the Jews, between the contract of marriage and the celebration of the nuptials, see Ge 24:55; Jg 14:8, yet such was the nature of this engagement, that unfaithfulness to each other was deemed adultery. See De 22:25,28.
With child of the Holy Ghost. See Barnes for Lu 1:35.
{u} “birth of Jesus” Lu 1:27
{*} “espoused to Joseph” “Fifth year before the account called A.D.”
People’s New Testament
The birth of Jesus Christ. The word [gennesis] rendered here “birth” is the same in Greek that is translated “genealogy” in Mt 1:1.
Mary having been betrothed. Not married, but engaged. Betrothal was, from the times of the patriarchs, a formal ceremony (Ge 25:34), and was regarded a binding obligation. It generally lasted a whole year before marriage. After betrothal unfaithfulness was regarded as adultery.
Before they came together. Before marriage.
She was found. The angel (Lu 1:26) predicted her conception, and when the prediction was verified she probably did not hesitate to reveal it. Her heart would be filled with joyous pride instead of shame.
Holy Ghost. Correctly, Holy Spirit. The Divine power. Christ is the only example of such a birth in all history. His birth, like his life and his resurrection, is a miracle.
Matthew Poole’s Commentary
Ver. 18. The evangelist prefaces this extraordinary birth of our Saviour in this manner.
Now the birth or Jesus Christ was on this wise; not in the ordinary course and manner in which children are conceived and brought forth into the world (`with child of the Holy Ghost’ Lu 1:35), but in this wonderful manner.
When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph. Betrothing, or espousing, was nothing else but a solemn promise of marriage made by two persons each to other, at such a distance of time as they agreed upon. It was a decent usage, approved of (if not ordained) by God, as appears by De 20:7. That we are obliged still to use it I dare not say; it might be a prudential order and constitution of that state. There was nothing in it typical, nothing to bring it under the notion of a carnal ordinance, as the apostle calls some of their ordinances relating to the worship of God. It seemeth equitable, that the parties to be married might have some convenient time to think seriously of the great change they are soon to make in their lives, and more solemnly seek unto God for his blessing upon them; as also that they might more freely discourse together about their household affairs, and the settlement of their families, than the modesty of the virgins of that age would otherwise have allowed them. It made them man and wife before God, though they came not together for some time after. The distance of time seemeth to have been left to the agreement of parties and parents. In this case we cannot certainly assert the distance, but it appeareth to have been such as that she was found with child before they came together. Mary knew what the evangelist here asserts, that it was by the Holy Ghost; for as she must know that she had not known man as she told the angel, Lu 1:34; so the angel had satisfied her, saying, Lu 1:35, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee. Therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God. It cannot be doubted but that she revealed this to some of her friends, but how it came to be found, or who found it, we are not told. Joseph as yet had no such revelation.
God would have his Son to be born of a virgin:
1. For the fulfilling of the promise, Isa 7:14.
2. Of the Holy Ghost, that the womb of the virgin being sanctified by the Spirit of holiness, there might be no traduction of original sin.
Of a betrothed virgin:
1. That he might not be under the reproach of illegitimacy.
2. Nor his mother subjected to the punishment of the Judaical law.
3. That Mary’s stock might be by her betrothed husband.
4. That Christ might have a guard in his infancy.